<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/</link>
	<description>Money Is Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:20:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design company</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/comment-page-1/#comment-7784</link>
		<dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=811#comment-7784</guid>
		<description>I know that Cuil is in its &quot;infancy&quot; but damn, it should be a lot more refined if it is going to claim to be a &quot;Google killer&quot; already. Just a simple search for the programming language &quot;COBOL&quot; yields no results. If you actually make the search for &quot;cobol language&quot; the first result is a dead link. That is just one broken search out of many. I have to admit, the random gay porn is pretty hilarious. And the guy with his head in someone&#039;s vagina for a LOLCAT search, that&#039;s just golden. Anxiously awaiting a good &quot;theonion.com&quot; article on Cuil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Cuil is in its &#8220;infancy&#8221; but damn, it should be a lot more refined if it is going to claim to be a &#8220;Google killer&#8221; already. Just a simple search for the programming language &#8220;COBOL&#8221; yields no results. If you actually make the search for &#8220;cobol language&#8221; the first result is a dead link. That is just one broken search out of many. I have to admit, the random gay porn is pretty hilarious. And the guy with his head in someone&#8217;s vagina for a LOLCAT search, that&#8217;s just golden. Anxiously awaiting a good &#8220;theonion.com&#8221; article on Cuil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wikipedia com</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/comment-page-1/#comment-7730</link>
		<dc:creator>wikipedia com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=811#comment-7730</guid>
		<description>[...] but Google returns wikipedia as the first result, then dog.com...But That Isn&#039;t The Whole Story!http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99...Wiki.com ::... wikipedia only indie wikis only encyclopedias only. tip: add your wiki below ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but Google returns wikipedia as the first result, then dog.com&#8230;But That Isn&#8217;t The Whole Story!http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99&#8230;Wiki.com ::&#8230; wikipedia only indie wikis only encyclopedias only. tip: add your wiki below &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog stories</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/comment-page-1/#comment-7641</link>
		<dc:creator>dog stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=811#comment-7641</guid>
		<description>[...] but Google returns Wikipedia as the first result, then dog.com...But That Isn&#039;t The Whole Story!http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99...Is the Montauk Monster a Dog? New Twist Emerges - Dog Magazine dot netSubscribe to the dog Magazine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but Google returns Wikipedia as the first result, then dog.com&#8230;But That Isn&#8217;t The Whole Story!http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99&#8230;Is the Montauk Monster a Dog? New Twist Emerges &#8211; Dog Magazine dot netSubscribe to the dog Magazine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Money Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/comment-page-1/#comment-7636</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Money Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=811#comment-7636</guid>
		<description>Hi Robin, finkx off Digg here!

I do like Cuil a little...

But is too infected by spam - and had failed to index numerous of my sites which had plenty of inbound links.

Also I think the colour scheme is a bad idea. White writing on black background is bad for your eyes.

Best Wishes,
Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robin, finkx off Digg here!</p>
<p>I do like Cuil a little&#8230;</p>
<p>But is too infected by spam &#8211; and had failed to index numerous of my sites which had plenty of inbound links.</p>
<p>Also I think the colour scheme is a bad idea. White writing on black background is bad for your eyes.</p>
<p>Best Wishes,<br />
Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/comment-page-1/#comment-7632</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=811#comment-7632</guid>
		<description>Though Cuil is very young, they got off to a terrible start. I blame them for hyping their product which crashed and didn&#039;t work properly when accessed.

Irrelevance is the key difference between Cuil and Google. Cuil is still serving up quite a few wrong photographs with their returns, a distinction that is making this search engine look awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though Cuil is very young, they got off to a terrible start. I blame them for hyping their product which crashed and didn&#8217;t work properly when accessed.</p>
<p>Irrelevance is the key difference between Cuil and Google. Cuil is still serving up quite a few wrong photographs with their returns, a distinction that is making this search engine look awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/comment-page-1/#comment-7631</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=811#comment-7631</guid>
		<description>[...] Original Fortune Watch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original Fortune Watch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isn%e2%80%99t-the-whole-story/comment-page-1/#comment-7630</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=811#comment-7630</guid>
		<description>[...] designing better futures wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Search engine Cuil launched earlier this evening, claiming a bigger index size (120 billion web pages) than Google or any other search engine. The pedigree of the founders and execs, which includes three ex senior Googlers, means the service will be compared to Google from day one. And the way they will be compared is index size and, more importantly, relevance/ranking of results. We’ve been testing the engine for the last hour. Based on our test queries Cuil is an excellent search engine, par [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] designing better futures wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Search engine Cuil launched earlier this evening, claiming a bigger index size (120 billion web pages) than Google or any other search engine. The pedigree of the founders and execs, which includes three ex senior Googlers, means the service will be compared to Google from day one. And the way they will be compared is index size and, more importantly, relevance/ranking of results. We’ve been testing the engine for the last hour. Based on our test queries Cuil is an excellent search engine, par [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->