<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the Rule of 72 Spots the Too-Good-To-Be-True Deals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/</link>
	<description>Money Is Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:20:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5188</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5188</guid>
		<description>I wonder why my finance instructors never told us about this secret! Fantastic.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why my finance instructors never told us about this secret! Fantastic.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socrates</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5178</link>
		<dc:creator>Socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5178</guid>
		<description>ah, no.  

the &quot;rule of 69&quot; (more cachet, i think) has been known since about 6 microseconds after the logarithm was invented, which is to say, at least since 1614.

what does the rule have to do with the title of your article?  an audience that has calculators would be a lot better served with some advice on how to identify &quot;too good to be true&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, no.  </p>
<p>the &#8220;rule of 69&#8243; (more cachet, i think) has been known since about 6 microseconds after the logarithm was invented, which is to say, at least since 1614.</p>
<p>what does the rule have to do with the title of your article?  an audience that has calculators would be a lot better served with some advice on how to identify &#8220;too good to be true&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Bal</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5153</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Bal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5153</guid>
		<description>Hi Viv,

How you doing? Well that genius behind Rule of 72 was definitely not me...lol. The genius is none other than the guy in the picture, Albert Einstein.

Take care and cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Viv,</p>
<p>How you doing? Well that genius behind Rule of 72 was definitely not me&#8230;lol. The genius is none other than the guy in the picture, Albert Einstein.</p>
<p>Take care and cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivienne Quek</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5152</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivienne Quek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5152</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s the genius that come out with &quot;Rule of 72&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s the genius that come out with &#8220;Rule of 72&#8243;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Bal</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Bal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5150</guid>
		<description>Hi Toby,

Thanks for your comment. In Finance there have been rules of 71 and 69.3 also. The  Rule Of 70 is normally explained only in terms of positive growth rates.

Rule Of 72 is used in a similar fashion, except that you divide the rate into 72 rather than 70. Rather than obtaining a population doubling period, you would typically calculate an investment doubling period. In finance, the Rule Of 72 is probably used in preference to the Rule Of 70 as 72 has more whole number divisors.

Hope this answers your question.

Take care and cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Toby,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. In Finance there have been rules of 71 and 69.3 also. The  Rule Of 70 is normally explained only in terms of positive growth rates.</p>
<p>Rule Of 72 is used in a similar fashion, except that you divide the rate into 72 rather than 70. Rather than obtaining a population doubling period, you would typically calculate an investment doubling period. In finance, the Rule Of 72 is probably used in preference to the Rule Of 70 as 72 has more whole number divisors.</p>
<p>Hope this answers your question.</p>
<p>Take care and cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5149</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5149</guid>
		<description>Why is it 72? I thought it was 70! 

It&#039;s part of the exponential function and I was taught that it was 70 (formed from the approximate division of 100 by the natural logarithm of 2).

Can you clarify this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it 72? I thought it was 70! </p>
<p>It&#8217;s part of the exponential function and I was taught that it was 70 (formed from the approximate division of 100 by the natural logarithm of 2).</p>
<p>Can you clarify this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Bal</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5147</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Bal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5147</guid>
		<description>Hi Robinsun,

Welcome to FortuneWatch and thanks for your kind words. I am a Financial Advisor.

Take care and cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robinsun,</p>
<p>Welcome to FortuneWatch and thanks for your kind words. I am a Financial Advisor.</p>
<p>Take care and cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robinsun</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-5145</link>
		<dc:creator>Robinsun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortunewatch.com/how-the-rule-of-72-spots-the-too-good-to-be-true-deals/#comment-5145</guid>
		<description>Hello Robin,

You got a nice blog.
What do you do actually?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Robin,</p>
<p>You got a nice blog.<br />
What do you do actually?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->