<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Cuil An Alternative To Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fortunewatch.com/is-cuil-an-alternative-to-goole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/is-cuil-an-alternative-to-goole/</link>
	<description>Money Is Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:20:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design company</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/is-cuil-an-alternative-to-goole/comment-page-1/#comment-7722</link>
		<dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=814#comment-7722</guid>
		<description>No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/is-cuil-an-alternative-to-goole/comment-page-1/#comment-7640</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=814#comment-7640</guid>
		<description>Cuil is definitely going for it, but it&#039;s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google&#039;s done. And even that would take years of effort.

Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It&#039;s in alpha, but I&#039;d be curious to hear your thoughts. http://me.dium.com/search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuil is definitely going for it, but it&#8217;s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google&#8217;s done. And even that would take years of effort.</p>
<p>Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It&#8217;s in alpha, but I&#8217;d be curious to hear your thoughts. <a href="http://me.dium.com/search"  rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosalie</title>
		<link>http://www.fortunewatch.com/is-cuil-an-alternative-to-goole/comment-page-1/#comment-7633</link>
		<dc:creator>rosalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortunewatch.com/?p=814#comment-7633</guid>
		<description>The site claims to scour far more of the Web than Google does. It promises to sift through more than 120 billion pages to arrive at the best results. Google no longer publicly offers up its breadth, though its silence there will only stir up the hype that Cuil is, in fact, the new Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site claims to scour far more of the Web than Google does. It promises to sift through more than 120 billion pages to arrive at the best results. Google no longer publicly offers up its breadth, though its silence there will only stir up the hype that Cuil is, in fact, the new Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->